Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adrenal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, adrenal hemorrhage has multiple etiologies. Because clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with adrenal hemorrhage are inadequately described, we examined the underlying etiology, need for intervention, evolution of imaging characteristics, and adequacy of subsequent evaluation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with adrenal hemorrhage (radiologist-confirmed density consistent with hemorrhage on computed tomography) from 2005 to 2021 at a university-based institution. Demographic characteristics, hemorrhage etiology, and subsequent follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 193 adrenal hemorrhage patients, the mean age was 49.2 ± 18.3 years, and 35% were female. Clinical presentations included trauma (47%), abdominal or flank pain (28%), incidental findings on imaging acquired for other reasons (12%), postoperative complication (8%), or shock (3%). Hemorrhage outside of the gland was present in 62% of patients. Unilateral hemorrhage was more frequent (93%) than bilateral (7%). A total of 12% of patients had nodules, but only 70% of these were identified on initial imaging, and only 43% had hormonal evaluation. Of 7 patients who had adrenalectomy or biopsy, pathology was either benign (57%) or nonadrenal malignancy (43%). No adrenocortical carcinomas were identified. Follow-up imaging was performed in 56% of patients and revealed decreased, stable, resolved, or increased adrenal hemorrhage size in 39%, 19%, 30%, and 12% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adrenal hemorrhage is secondary to multiple etiologies, most commonly trauma. In the setting of adrenal hemorrhage, many adrenal nodules were not identified on initial imaging. Only a minority of patients with nodules underwent "complete" biochemical evaluation. Follow-up imaging may improve the identification of underlying nodules needing hormonal evaluation.

Adjuvant Palbociclib May be Associated with Delayed Recurrence in Completely Resected Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Results of a Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are locally aggressive and frequently recur following complete surgical resection. Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/CDK6 inhibitor, is effective in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable liposarcoma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience using adjuvant palbociclib to delay recurrence. METHODS: Patients with resected RPS were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. In 2017, we began offering adjuvant palbociclib to patients following complete gross resection. Treatment interval, defined as the time between surgical resection and re-resection or change in systemic therapy, was compared between patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib or observation. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, 12 patients underwent a total of 14 operations (14 patient cases) and were selected for adjuvant palbociclib for recurrence prevention. These patients were compared with 14 patients who, since 2010, underwent a total of 20 operations (20 patient cases) and were selected for observation. Histology was primarily dedifferentiated liposarcoma for both groups (observation: 70% [14/20]; adjuvant palbociclib: 64% [9/14]). All patients underwent complete gross resection. Neither age, number of previous surgeries, histologic grade, or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status differed between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib experienced a longer treatment interval than those selected for observation, although it did not reach statistical significance (20.5 months vs. 13.1 months, p = 0.08, log rank). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant palbociclib may be associated with a prolonged interval between liposarcoma resection and the need for re-resection or other systemic therapy. Palbociclib may be effective in delaying liposarcoma recurrence, and its use for this indication warrants prospective study.

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Retrorectus Self-Adhering Mesh: A Single-Center Long-Term Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Mesh repair has been demonstrated to be superior to suture alone in ventral hernia repair. In a previous short-term pilot study, the authors found lower postoperative narcotic requirements with self-adhering mesh. The aim of this study was to follow-up on that pilot study, using long-term data. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. All patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with retrorectus mesh and who had at least a 12-month follow-up were reviewed. Comparisons were performed between patients who received self-adhering mesh and those who received transfascially sutured mesh, using matched-pair analysis, examining perioperative outcomes, surgical-site occurrences, and hernia recurrence/bulge. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included in the study, with 21 patients undergoing repair with transfascially sutured mesh and 21 patients receiving self-adhering mesh. Average length of follow-up was 1078 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. Patients receiving self-adhering mesh had significantly shorter surgery, and a shorter hospital length of stay. They also had a tendency toward lower narcotic requirements. There were no significant differences in the rate of surgical-site occurrences, hernia recurrences, or bulge between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study shows that self-adhering mesh in ventral hernia repair results in similar long-term outcomes to transfascially sutured mesh, with shorter surgery, shorter length of stay, and a tendency toward improved pain control. These findings mirror the known advantages of self-adhering mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Further research is needed to study the incidence of chronic pain and the cost-effectiveness of self-adhering mesh. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Implementation of a COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Department Education Program for Underserved Communities.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an opportunity for significant reflection on our public health response as providers. Throughout the past two years, we learned that administration of COVID-19 vaccines, rapidly and widely across all communities, has been key to halting the spread of the virus. One significant challenge in promoting a large-scale immunization program is the threat of vaccine hesitancy. A general mistrust in healthcare providers exists across the country, especially in underrepresented minority (URM) communities. Objective This study aims to determine reasons for vaccine hesitancy in an urban emergency department and to provide targeted education on the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines to patients. Methods An interprofessional quality improvement team was assembled to develop an educational intervention addressing COVID-19 vaccine safety for vaccine-eligible patients receiving treatment in the emergency department at an urban community hospital where over 70% of patients identify as URM. A survey was conducted to elucidate patients' concerns surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. Upon completion of the survey, up-to-date safety information and education targeting their surveyed concerns were provided by trained medical students. A follow-up survey was conducted to assess the impact of education on patients' attitudes toward the vaccine. Surveys were developed using standardized scoring systems from the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (OCEANS) II study and the Kaiser Foundation. Hesitancy scores before and after education were tabulated to assess the effectiveness of targeted education in improving vaccine hesitancy. Results Patients cited a variety of concerns surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. The three most common reasons for declining vaccines were potential side effects (67.3% were concerned or extremely concerned), the belief that COVID-19 vaccines are neither effective nor safe (64.5% were concerned to extremely concerned), and the risk of developing COVID-19 infection from the vaccine itself (38.8% were concerned to extremely concerned). This information was used to address these concerns directly with patients, answer questions, clarify information, and encourage patients to get vaccinated. Through this education program, vaccine hesitancy scores improved by an average of 29% indicating an increased likelihood of patients who would get vaccinated in the future. Of patients receiving education, 38% agreed to sign up for a vaccine appointment during the intervention. Conclusion The emergency department often serves vulnerable patient populations. As such, its role in public health in these communities cannot be underestimated. This quality improvement project is a novel method that can be used to develop and implement public health education programs to address specific community needs in the emergency department. These results show that a multidisciplinary healthcare team can provide a measurable change in attitudes about vaccine safety with directed education in the emergency department that can help address vaccine hesitancy in the future.

Pulmonary artery size on computed tomography is associated with major morbidity after pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship of pulmonary artery diameter (PAD) measured by computed tomography (CT) with outcomes following lobectomy. METHODS: Records of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer between 2011 and 2018 were reviewed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcome data were derived from the institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Luminal diameter of the central pulmonary arteries and ascending aorta were measured on preoperative CTs. Logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association of PAD with complications. RESULTS: A total of 736 lobectomy patients were included, who had a preoperative CT scan (25% with contrast, 75% noncontrast) available for review. A total of 141 (19.2%) patients had an enlarged main PAD ≥30 mm, and 58 (7.9%) patients had a main PAD that was larger than the ascending aorta (PA/ascending aorta ratio > 1). The right or left PAD on the surgical side was associated with major complication (odds ratio per mm, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.18; P < .001), unexpected intensive care unit admission (odds ratio per millimeter, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19; P = .002), and 30-day mortality (odds ratio per millimeter, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.46; P = .007). On multivariable analysis, adjusted for cardiovascular comorbidities, pulmonary function, and the operative approach, surgical side PAD remained an independent factor associated with major complication. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based measurements of the PAD on the operative side may inform of the about the risk of major complications after lobectomy. Review of PA size on preoperative CT scans may help identify patients who would benefit from formal evaluation of PA pressures to improve the operative risk assessment.